Tuesday, April 24, 2012


imgres.jpg
Can school officials strip search a thirteen-year-old girl suspected of giving ibuprofen to a classmate?

Relevant provision of Constitution:

Amendment IV 
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
.

The U.S. Supreme Court announced today that it will review a lower court ruling that school officials violated the constitutional rights of a 13-year-old Arizona girl when they strip searched her based on a classmate’s uncorroborated accusation that she possessed ibuprofen.


The case, Redding v. Safford Unified School District, was appealed from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which found the strip search to be unconstitutional. A six-judge majority of the appeals court further held that the school official who ordered the search is not entitled to immunity as a result of his actions

"Overzealous school officials stripped our client of her clothes and her constitutional rights," said Steven R. Shapiro, Legal Director of the ACLU. "We are confident that the Supreme Court will recognize that such conduct has no place in America’s schools and will protect the privacy rights of America’s students."

Savana Redding, an eighth grade honor roll student at Safford Middle School in Safford, Arizona, was pulled from class on October 8, 2003 by the school’s vice principal, Kerry Wilson. Earlier that day, Wilson had discovered prescription-strength ibuprofen - 400 milligram pills equivalent to two over-the-counter ibuprofen pills, such as Advil - in the possession of Redding’s classmate. Under questioning and faced with punishment, the classmate claimed that Redding, who had no history of disciplinary problems or substance abuse, had given her the pills. Safford maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward all prescription medicines, including prescription-strength ibuprofen.

After escorting Redding to his office, Wilson presented Redding with the ibuprofen pills and informed her of her classmate’s accusations. Redding said she had never seen the pills before and agreed to a search of her possessions, wanting to prove she had nothing to hide. Joined by a female school administrative assistant, Wilson searched Redding’s backpack and found nothing. Instructed by Wilson, the administrative assistant then took Redding to the school nurse’s office in order to perform a strip search.

"It offends both common sense and the Constitution to undertake such an excessive, traumatizing search based on nothing more than an uncorroborated accusation of ibuprofen possession," said Adam Wolf, an attorney with the ACLU and counsel of record in the case. "Our fundamental right to privacy must not be cast aside when faced with groundless allegations rooted in unfounded fears of adolescent Advil abuse."

120424_russell_pearce_ap_328.jpg

Arizona law author spars with Schumer

This is the third article on the Arizona law SB1070  this is so you can see how it is going so far. This happened to day! Not a couple of years ago.


Schumer pressed SB 1070 author Russell Pearce about a provision that allows citizens to turn in cops if they don’t appear to be enforcing the immigration law.


“Isn’t that demeaning to police officers?” Schumer asked Pearce. “Won’t that push them to do things to protect themselves from lawsuits that they believe they shouldn’t do?

Pearce defended his law, telling Schumer that it was written with cooperation with law enforcement officials and that particular provision gave cops “the protection they need and the discretion at the same time.”

“I get a little disappointed that we’re the bad guys for enforcing the law,” Pearce, sounding irritated, later told Schumer. “Mr. Chairman, we have a national crisis and we continue to ignore it … I think Americans are a little tired of the drive-by statements from politicians.”

The New York senator also questioned Pearce over a training manual for Arizona police officers that suggested dress would be one of the indications used by law enforcement to determine whether a person was in the country legally.

“What does an illegal immigrant dress like?” Schumer asked Pearce.

In response, Pearce said that manual was developed in conjunction with federal immigration officials.

At one point, Pearce criticized Schumer for arguing that SB 1070 could lead to racial profiling by police officers. The law, Pearce said, explicitly bars profiling.

“I think it’s demeaning to law enforcement to assume they don’t know how to do their job,” Pearce told Schumer.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) also traded jabs with Pearce over the DREAM Act, which would offer minors who meet certain requirements a pathway to citizenship.

“All of us have a heart and all of us have compassion,” Pearce said, calling the bill “blanket amnesty.” “But laws without consequences are no laws at all.”

Durbin responded: “Mr. Pearce, the DREAM Act is not a blanket amnesty.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75533.html#ixzz1sypIQvvS

Arizona Enacts Stringent Law on Immigration



http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html?_r=1 
this article was written in April 2010. But is still a hot issue especially now because it has finally reached the Supreme Court. This will inform you of what this law is and does.
 It requires police officers, “when practicable,” to detain people they reasonably suspect are in the country without authorization and to verify their status with federal officials, unless doing so would hinder an investigation or emergency medical treatment.
It also makes it a state crime — a misdemeanor — to not carry immigration papers. In addition, it allows people to sue local government or agencies if they believe federal or state immigration law is not being enforced.


Thursday, April 19, 2012

Norway mass-shooting trial reopens debate on violent video games

120419040713-modern-warfare-2-story-top.jpg

http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/19/tech/gaming-gadgets/games-violence-norway-react/index.html?hpt=hp_c1


Norway's alleged mass killer testified on Thursday that he played video games as a way to train for a shooting spree that killed 77 people last summer. In particular, Anders Behring Breivik said at his trial that he played "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2" as a means of shooting practice.
The confessed shooter also said he once played the online game "World of Warcraft," a role-playing adventure with multiple players from around the world, for as many as 16 hours a day.
For people who have long suspected that there is some link between violent video games and real-world violence, the statement offered frightening new evidence for why the video-game industry should be more strictly regulated.
I had to post this and can't believe how many times in different ways this has come up after we did the Mock trial in Class. The first link is to the video article and the second link is to the article in which explains what he wanted to do and did.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/19/world/europe/norway-breivik-trial/index.html?hpt=wo_c1
120419011606-anders-behring-breivik-fist-story-body.jpg

Monday, April 16, 2012

Buffet Proposes a 28th Amendment

unknown.jpg
http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000032014 
I know Buffett was joking but sometimes I wish it could happen. With all this nonsense coming from congress not wanting to do anything, it's hard not wanting all of them replaced.

I don't think they would make it the 28th amendment though. They would not vote themselves out!

WATCH THE VIDEO!

I Plead The Fifth!

http://cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoftv/2012/04/16/bts-gsa-statements-dc.pool

Jeff Neely, the General Services Administration official who organized the 2010 conference that cost $800,000, repeatedly refused to answer questions, saying more than five times: "I respectfully decline to answer any questions here today based on my Fifth Amendment constitutional privileges."


He can exercise his 5th amendment right, but I feel that it only makes him look like a coward, and a even bigger thief. 


 The link will bring you to the video where he declines to answer questions.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Should the school district be allowed to demand middle-schooler's Facebook password?

http://redtape.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/13/10657012-up-against-the-wall-should-district-be-allowed-to-demand-middle-schoolers-facebook-password

A 12-year-old Minnesota girl was reduced to tears while school officials and a police officer rummaged through her private Facebook postings after forcing her to surrender her password, an ACLU lawsuit alleges. 
The claims are the latest in a string of tales showing that even password-protected, private online activities might not be safe from curious government agencies and schools.
The girl, whose identity is withheld in the lawsuit, came home "crying, depressed, angry, scared and embarrassed" after she was intimidated into divulging her login information by a school counselor and a deputy sheriff, who arrived in uniform, armed with a Taser, the lawsuit alleges.

I believe that the district should not have read or gone through the students facebook. Not only is it her first amendment right taht is being violated but it is also her 4th amendment by searching her facebook. I believe that if they really wanted to see what was on her wall or facebook there could have been other options. For someone to have complained about it they must have had access through there account to see. why didn't they borrow there account to let the officials look that way?

She might not be the nicestest little girl but she still has rights. I know that sometimes 12 year olds can get out of control but as school counselor they should have known better!